Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:9222
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 173 of 2026 1 - Lalmuni S/o Amir Singh, Aged About 45 Years Caste Rautiya, R/o Village Chherdand Tukutoli Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Rajkishore S/o Amir Singh Aged About 35 Years Caste Rautiya, R/o Village Chherdand Tukutoli Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Gulapi Singh W/o Late Jagdev Singh Aged About 51 Years Caste Rautiya, R/o Village Chherdand Tukutoli Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt. Bhagwati Singh D/o Late Jagdev Singh Aged About 34 Years W/o Virendra Kumar, Caste Rautiya, R/o Village Chherdand Tukutoli Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Jayshanker Singh S/o Late Jagdev Singh Aged About 32 Years Caste Rautiya, R/o Village Chherdand Tukutoli Tahsil Duldula, SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2026.02.23 14:41:06 +0530
2 District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Ku. Chandrakala D/o Late Jagdev Singh Aged About 29 Years Caste Rautiya, R/o Village Chherdand Tukutoli Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 7 - Yashwant Singh S/o Late Jagdev Singh Aged About 24 Years Caste Rautiya, R/o Village Chherdand Tukutoli Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 8 - Satyadev Singh S/o Late Jagdev Singh Aged About 22 Years Caste Rautiya R/o Village- Chherdand Tukutoli Tashil Duldula District- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh,
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Sahaudra Bai D/o Gambhir Singh Aged About 55 Years W/o Banshidhar Singh, Caste Rautiya, R/o Village Chherdand Tukatoli Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Saraswati D/o Gambhir Singh, Aged About 52 Years W/o Sardayal Singh, Caste Rautiya, R/o Village Sendrimunda, Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sanmati D/o Tahlu Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Chherdand, Tahsil Bagicha, Uptahsil Kansabel, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh
3 4 - Mus.
Lalita Bai Wd/o Ramnath Singh Aged About 45 Years Caste Rautiya, R/o Village Gattibuda, Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Hukumchand Singh S/o Ramnath Singh Aged About 22 Years Caste Rautiya, R/o Village Gattibuda, Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Makund Singh S/o Ramnath Singh Aged About 20 Years Caste Rautiya, R/o Village Gattibuda, Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 7 - Shivnath Singh S/o Jaypal Singh Aged About 40 Years Caste Rautiya, R/o Village Gattibuda, Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 8 - Uttam Singh S/o Jaypal Singh Aged About 35 Years Caste Rautiya, R/o Village Gattibuda, Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 9 - Budhani D/o Tahlu Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Jammunda, Tahsil Bagicha, Uptahsil Kansabel, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 10 - Kishun Ram S/o Loknath Aged About 48 Years R/o Village
4 Bangurkela, Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 11 - Damodar Ram S/o Loknath Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Bangurkela, Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 12 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Collector District- Jashpur Chhattisgarh,
... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri J.K. Saxena, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Lekhram Dhruv, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri
Bibhu Datta Guru
, Judge
Order on Board 23.02.2026
1. The MCC has been filed for restoration of Second Appeal No. 21/2017, which was dismissed for want of prosecution by this Court vide order dated 03.02.2026. 2. On due consideration and for the reasons assigned therein, which is duly supported by an afÏdavit, this Court is satisfied that sufÏcient cause has been shown for restoration of Second Appeal No. 21/2017
5
3. Accordingly, this MCC is allowed. Registry is directed to restore Second Appeal No. 21/2017, to its original number subject to payment of costs of Rs.
2,000/- payable to the High Court Legal Aid Committee. Sd/-
(Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib