Dilwale 1 254-fa-1666-13.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 254 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1666 OF 2013 The State Of Maharashtra And Ors VERSUS Sudhakar Bavaji Bhagade And Ors WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1671 OF 2013 The State Of Maharashtra And Ors VERSUS Bhaskar Sakharam Bhagade WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1667 OF 2013 The State Of Maharashtra And Ors VERSUS Jalindar Sitaram Bhagade And Ors … AGP for Appellants/State : Mr. A. D. Wange Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : Mr. D. R. Jaybhar & Mr. D. A. Bide ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 29.09.2026 PER COURT : 1. Admit 2. As the acquisition proceeding is of the year 1997, the appeals are being heard finally with the consent of learned counsel for the respective parties. 3. By these appeals, the appellant/State is aggrieved by the judgment and award dated 27.07.2007 passed by the learned District Judge-2, Beed 2026:BHC-AUG:46982 Dilwale 2 254-fa-1666-13.odt in LAR Nos.376, 377 and 378 of 2006, whereby the learned Reference Court enhanced the compensation. 4. The land of the claimants was acquired from village Tandalwadi Ghat. Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, “the Act”) was published on 18.09.2003, award under Section 11 of the Act was passed on 16.06.2005. 5. Learned AGP submits that the compensation granted by the learned Reference Court is within four times the compensation granted by the SLAO. 6. In fact the State Government vide Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 3rd November 2016 with Corrigenda dated 23rd February 2017 and 13th August 2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 7. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned award. Hence, the present Appeals are dismissed. 8. In view of dismissal of the Appeals, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. ]