SHRAVAN MAHATO ALIAS BABA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5493/2026 · 2026-06-19
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17198 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17198 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:17915] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5493 of 2026
------ Shravan Mahato @ Baba, aged about 24 years, son of Ashok Mahato, resident of Village Madhupur, P.O. & P.S. Seraikella, District Seraikella
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Praful Jojo, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-19-06-2026
Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a Supplementary Affidavit. Let the same be kept in the record.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Kandra P.S. Case No.08 (S) of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 309 (4) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and looted mobile phone, wallet, ATM card, Aadhar Card, PAN card and assaulted the informant, causing injuries to him. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. It is further submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 25.09.2025 passed in B.A. No.8264 of 2025. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 07.08.2025 as has been mentioned in para-10 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Seraikella in connection with Kandra P.S. Case No.08 (S) of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-19.06.2026-Animesh/