Sri Choudary Kalyan Kumar v. State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/3574/2018 · 2026-02-08
Sumathi Jagadam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17196 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17196 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010080652018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 3574/2018 Between:
1. SRI CHOUDARY KALYAN KUMAR, S/O. APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.39-23-11, MADHAVADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICTVISAKHAPATANAM
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL SECRETARY (REVENUE), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT AT VISAKHAPATNAM
3. THE TAHSILDAR, CHINAGADILI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in preventing him to make construction pursuant to the permission which was granted in his favour vide Permit No. B.A.No.1086/2695/B/Z6/VAM/2017
2 JS,J W.P.No.3574 of 2018
dated 18-09-2017 in the land situated in survey No.52/B in an extent of 800.50 square yards in Padmanabhanagar area of Venkatapuram village of Chinagadili Mandal, Visakhapatnam, without issuing any notice and also without following the procedure contemplated under Law as illegal and also in violation of principles of natural justice, consequently direct the respondents not to take any coercive steps with regarding to the land in survey No.52/B situated at Padmanabhanagar area of Venkatapuram Village of Chinagadili Mandal of Visakhapatnam District pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to take any coercive to prevent the construction made pursuant
to the permit No. B.A.No.1086/2695/B/Z6/VAM/2017, dated 18-9-2017 without following the procedure contemplated under law, pending disposal of the C.R.P. before this Hon'ble Court, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. N SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) This Court made the following:
3 JS,J W.P.No.3574 of 2018
ORDER:
The petitioner obtained building permission from the Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation granted building permission vide permit No.1086/2695/B/Z6/VAM/2017 dated 18.09.2017. The petitioner alleged that the respondents are preventing constructions on 800.50 square yards in Sy.No.52/B situated in Venkatapuram Village, Chinagadili Mandal, Visakhapatnam.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader, based on written instructions from the Tahsildar, Gopalapatnam Mandal, dated 21.01.2026, submitted that the construction is actively taking place in Sy.No.54 of Venkatapuram Village, not Sy.No.52. It is further submitted that Sy.No.54 belongs to S.V.L.N.Devasthanam. As the construction has already been made, the respondents would proceed against the petitioner following due process of law. Recording the submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 9th February, 2026 cbs
4 JS,J W.P.No.3574 of 2018
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION No.3574 of 2018
9th February, 2026 cbs