Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17192 (MAD)

V.VENKATESHKUMAR v. The Honble Registrar General

WP/9185/2026 · 2026-04-21

N Senthilkumar, R Suresh Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.9185 of 2026 __________ Page No.1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR W.P.No.9185 of 2026 V.Venkateshkumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Registrar General, High Court of Judicature, Chennai-104. 2. The Principal District Judge, City Civil Court Chennai, Chennai 600 104. ..Respondent(s) Directing the 1st respondent to grant one way transfer from City Civil Court, Chennai to District Court, Dharmapuri by considering petitioner representation dated 06.08.2025 (Additional representation dated 30.09.2025). For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.MD.Nasrullah For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Vasantha Kumar, Standing Counsel ORDER (Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) The prayer sought herein is for a writ of mandamus, to direct the first respondent to grant one-way transfer from the City Civil Court, Chennai, to the District Court, Dharmapuri, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 06.08.2025 and additional representation dated 30.09.2025. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.9185 of 2026 __________ Page No.2 of 4 2. The petitioner wants to get one-way transfer, for which, he has given a representation on 06.08.2025 and an additional representation on 30.09.2025 and in order to consider the said representations and to pass orders, seeking a mandamus, he has filed this writ petition. 3. Transfer is not a matter of right. Due to administrative exigencies or contingencies, routinely, such transfers are being made. When that being the position, no mandamus could be issued to the transferring Authority to transfer a particular employee on his own will and request. Whenever such a request is given by any employee, it is for the concerned employer, who is the Authority to give transfer or to refuse the same, to decide such representation on merits and in accordance with law. For such purpose, the Court cannot issue a mandamus, which will set a wrong precedent. 4. In that view of the matter, the prayer sought herein cannot be acceded and the writ petition is liable to be dismissed, accordingly, it is dismissed. No costs. (R.S.K.,J.) (N.S.,J.) 21-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No (drm) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.9185 of 2026 __________ Page No.3 of 4 To: 1. The Registrar General, High Court of Judicature, Chennai-104. 2. The Principal District Judge, City Civil Court Chennai, Chennai 600 104. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.9185 of 2026 __________ Page No.4 of 4 R.SURESH KUMAR, J. AND N.SENTHILKUMAR, J. (drm) W.P.No.9185 of 2026 21-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis