[2026:RJ-JP:12892] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3659/2026 Radhe @ Radheshyam, R/o Sone Ka Gurja, Police Station Sone Ka Gurja, District Dholpur. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 27/03/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 54/2025 registered at Police Station Sone Ka Gurja, District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Section(s) 351(2), 351(3), 308(4) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 15.12.2025. He further submits that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has already been filed. He further submits that the accused-petitioner is already enlarged on bail in other criminal cases instituted against him. He further submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the [2026:RJ-JP:12892] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3659/2026] accused-petitioner in custody and therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove and submits that there are criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner that charge-sheet has already been filed; the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 15.12.2025; the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Radhe @ Radheshyam is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not be involved in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station. [2026:RJ-JP:12892] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3659/2026] 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J KAVISH /69