- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13534 CRP No. 843 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 843 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI B S MUNIRAJU S/O SIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT BAKTHANAPALYA VILLAGE, VAJARAHALLI DAKAHLE, KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.S. NAGESH., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI NARAYANAPPA S/O LATE BYLANJINAPPA AND SIDDAGANGAMMA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT VAJARAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123. 2. SMT. BHAGYAMMA D/O LATE BYLANJINAPPA AND SIDDAGANGAMMA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT VAJARAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123. Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13534 CRP No. 843 of 2024 3. SMT. REVAMMA W/O LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT VAJARAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123. 4. SRI. BYLAPPA S/O LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT VAJARAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123. 5. SRI. KALYANKUMAR S/O LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT VAJARAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. OMKARA MURTHY G., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; R3 & R5 SERVED) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 08.08.2024 PASSED ON I.A.NO.6 IN OS.NO.508/17 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NELAMANGALA, REJECTING IA. NO.VI FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(a) AND (d) OF CPC, FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13534 CRP No. 843 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER The parties herein have filed a joint memo dated 04.03.2026 stating that the parties have arrived at amicable settlement and they would like to settle the dispute in O.S.No.508/2017. However, since this Civil Revision Petition is pending consideration, the parties would like to get the Civil Revision Petition disposed of to enable the parties to settle the matter before the Trial Court. 2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition stands disposed of in view of the joint memo. 4. Office to return the Trial Court Records to the concerned Trial Court, forthwith. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL CT:JL