Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17183 (BOM)

THE STATE OF MAH v. ZUMBER APPASAHEB JAGTAP AND ORS

FA/213/2017 · 2026-09-29

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Dilwale 1 275-FA-213-17.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 275 FIRST APPEAL NO. 213 OF 2017 The State Of Maharashtra VERSUS Zumber Appasaheb Jagtap And Ors ... AGP for Appellant/State : Mr. S. S. Dande ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 29.09.2026 PER COURT : 1. Admit 2. As the acquisition proceeding is of the year 1994, the appeal is being heard finally with the consent of learned counsel for the respective parties. 3. By this appeal, the appellant/State is aggrieved by the judgment and award dated 12.10.2009 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Beed in LAR No.233/2007, whereby the learned Reference Court enhanced the compensation. 4. The land of the claimants from village Tawalwadi Tal. Ashti Dist. Beed was acquired for the purpose of construction of Percolation Tank at Tawalwadi. The notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, “the Act”) was published on 24.07.1994, award under Section 11 of the Act was passed on 27.07.1996. 5. Learned AGP submits that the compensation granted by the learned 2026:BHC-AUG:46978 Dilwale 2 275-FA-213-17.odt Reference Court is within four times the compensation granted by the SLAO. 6. In fact the State Government vide Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 3rd November 2016 with Corrigenda dated 23rd February 2017 and 13th August 2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 7. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned award. Hence, the present Appeal is dismissed. 8. In view of dismissal of the Appeal, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. ]