[2026:RJ-JP:4520] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4422/2022 Mahesh Chand Sharma S/o Late Shri Hanuman Sahai Sharma, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Jaichandpura, Via Gathwadi, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Executive Director (Administration), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. The Executive Director (Traffic), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House, C- Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jaipur Depot, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Saini For Respondent(s) : Ms. Tanushka Saxena for Mr. Siddharth Bapna HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 30/01/2026 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer: “1) By an appropriate writ order or direction in nature thereof respondents may kindly be directed to promote the petitioner on the post of Assistant Traffic Inspector (ATI) with all consequential benefits; 2) Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon’ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case may kindly also be passed in favour of petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 04.01.2024. in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7703/2022 “Pawan Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan & [2026:RJ-JP:4520] (2 of 2) [CW-4422/2022] Ors.” submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Pawan Kumar (supra) passed by this Court. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Pawan Kumar (supra) and Vimla Devi Saini Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. “S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7330/2016 decided on 20.11.2017” with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /70