[2026:RJ-JP:6452] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4503/2019 Vimal Kumar S/o Late Shri Kedarnath, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Near Radhakrishan Dharmshala, Busawar, Tehsil Wair, District Bharatpur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Chairman-Cum-Managing Director Chomu House, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. The Executive Director (Traffic), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Headquarter, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 3. The Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Tizara Depot, Tizara, District Alwar (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : Ms. Devyani Rathore HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 11/02/2026 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “The impugned order dated 26.12.2014 as well as impugned order dated 08.07.2016 passe by the respondents may kindly be quashed and set aside and the respondents be directed to reinstate the petitioner back in service on the post of Conductor with all consequential benefits’” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 31.05.2017 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3687/2015 titled as Ramroop Meena Vs. [2026:RJ-JP:6452] (2 of 3) [CW-4503/2019] RSRTC and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court on the basis of ratio laid down in case of Hanuwant Singh Vs. RSRTC & Ors, SB Civil Writ Petition No. 9242/2014. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid ratio. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed in light of Ramroop Meena Vs. RSRTC and Ors. (supra) and Hanuwant Singh Vs. RSRTC (supra). 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Hanuwant Singh Vs. RSRTC & Ors (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. [2026:RJ-JP:6452] (3 of 3) [CW-4503/2019] 5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended to the petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /96