[2026:RJ-JP:12812] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1375/2026 Bhuri @ Satish S/o Ramkhiladi, R/o Village Sunipur, Police Station Baadi Sadar, District Dholpur (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Baadi, District Dholpur) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amitabh Jatav Ms. Preeti Kumari Mr. Puneet Prajapat Ms. Ritika Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 27/03/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 258/2025 registered at Police Station Bari Sadar, District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Section(s) 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 351(3) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 04.11.2025. He further submits that charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has already been filed. He further submits that the injuries sustained by the injured are neither fatal nor dangerous to life. He further submits that there is no criminal antecedent against the accused- petitioner and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner [2026:RJ-JP:12812] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1375/2026] in custody and therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties that there is no criminal antecedent against the accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 04.11.2025. Charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has already been filed. Trial will take its own time. Without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Bhuri @ Satish S/o Ramkhiladi is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J KAVISH /17