Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17178 (JHR)

DAULAT MAHTO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/133/2026 · 2026-06-19

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:17866 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 133 of 2026 ------- Daulat Mahto, son of Mahesh Mahto, resident of Jilling, Pandra, P.O and P.S. and District- Lohardaga, Jharkhand. .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shri Manoj Kumar Ranjan, the Director, Primary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi, Jharkhand. …Opp. Party(s). ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Abhijeet Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State: Mr. Prashant Kr. Rai, Advocate. ------ 05/19.06.2026 It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the opposite parties that the order dated 13.8.2025 passed in WP(S) No. 3688 of 2025 has been complied with by passing a reasoned order on the representation, made by the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid submission, I am of the opinion that no contempt is made out. Accordingly, this contempt is dropped. Pending interlocutory application, if any, also stands disposed of. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file an appropriate application challenging the order passed by the opposite parties. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 19th June, 2026 Anu/SKC-Cp2.