Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17176 (JHR)

ROHIT TIGGA ALIAS ROHIT ORAON v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5463/2026 · 2026-06-18

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:17774] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5463 of 2026 ------ Rohit Tigga @ Rohit Oraon, Aged about 31 years, Son of Somra Oraon, Resident of Village Agru, P.O.- Bijuliya, P.S.- Ratu, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Apurva, Advocate Md. Shadab Bin Haque, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-18-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Ratu P.S. Case No.40 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 61(2), 238, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with Vineet Khalkho attempted to commit murder of the son of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the only allegation against the petitioner is of instigating the co-accused to commit murder of the victim. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 03.02.2026 as mentioned in para-17 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-15 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Ranchi in connection with Ratu P.S. Case No.40 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 18.06.2026 Saroj/