NURJAMAL HUSSAIN DEWAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.
WP(C)/5324/2018 · 2026-01-04
N Unni Krishnan Nair
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17173 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17173 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010172722018
2026:GAU-AS:86
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5329/2018 ABU SAYED S/O. LT. SARBESH ALI, VILL. DIMAPUR, P.O. KALGACHIA, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM-781319. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE AND D.M. (LR) DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY.-06.
2:THE DY. COMMISSIONER BARPETA DISTRICT BARPETA ASSAM-781301.
3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER KALGACHIA REVENUE CIRCLE BARPETA ASSAM-781319 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. MD S HOQUE, MR D SAIKIA,MR. S RAHMAN,MS A BORAH Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE Linked Case : WP(C)/5324/2018
Page No.# 2/3 NURJAMAL HUSSAIN DEWAN S/O- AMZAD HUSSAIN DEWAN VILLAGE- GARALA GAON P.O. NIRALA DIST. BARPETA ASSAM- 781308. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM REVENUE AND D.M. (LR) DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-6.
2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BARPETA DISTRICT BARPETA ASSAM- 781301.
3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER BAGHBAR REVENUE CIRCLE BARPETA ASSAM- 781308. ------------ Advocate for : MR. MD S HOQUE Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.
Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER
05/01/2026 Heard Mr. J Hussain along with Mr. S Hoque, learned counsel for the petitioners in the above noted writ petitions. Also heard Mr. J Handique, learned Standing counsel, Revenue Department as well as Ms. M Bhattacharjee, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, appearing for the State respondents. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the present writ petitions, the petitioners in the above noted writ petitions have, on their selection, have been appointed as Gaon Pradhans. Accordingly, they submit that the present writ petitions have become infructuous. Prayer is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners in the above noted writ petitions, the writ petitions, being WP(C) No. 5329/2018 and WP(C) No. 5324/2018 stand closed as having become infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant