[2026:RJ-JP:1577] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6811/2002 Mahaveer Singh S/o Late Shri Jethu Singh Shekhawat, aged about 52 years, R/o Village Sewdra, Post Shahpura, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Sikar (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India through Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi. 2. The Director General, Central Industrial Security Force, 13 C.G.O. Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi. 3. Assistant Inspector General, N.S. Central Industrial Security Force Campus, Saket, New Delhi. 4. Deputy Inspector General, Central Industrial Security Force, North Sector, New Delhi. 5. Deputy Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force Unit, Jaipur Airport, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Monika Jhajharia on behalf of Mr. Sukhveer Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Pareek, CGPC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 15/01/2026 1. Petitioner has challenged orders dated 05.07.2002 & 11.09.2002 passed by Assistant Inspector General and Deputy Commandant, CISF respectively for effecting recovery of Rs.12,076/- in 24 equal installments. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that such recovery was being effected against the petitioner without following the due procedure and affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, whereas the recovery sought to be made is [2026:RJ-JP:1577] (2 of 2) [CW-6811/2002] stigmatic as allegation with regard to mishandling the vehicle was imposed upon the petitioner, who was serving as driver. 3. Thereupon, learned counsel for the respondents has drawn attention of this Court towards Annexure-R/1 dated 09.04.2001, which gives reference of Court of Enquiry in respect of vehicle No. JK-14-1526 as well as order of appeal dated 03.09.2002 (Annexure-R/2) submitted along with reply and he opposed the writ petition by stating that correct facts have not been placed on record. Order impugned has been passed after giving due opportunity to the petitioner and after conducting Court of Enquiry and even against the order of penalty, appeal was filed by the petitioner, which was also decided by the Appellate Authority after taking into account all the facts, material on record and the grounds raised in the appeal. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 5. In view of the above, where penalty of Rs.12,076/- have been imposed upon the petitioner after following the due procedure and conducting the Court of Enquiry and even the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed, learned counsel for the petitioner has utterly failed to point out any irregularity, illegality or perversity in the proceedings against him. Hence, writ petition filed by the petitioner, is hereby, dismissed being devoid of any substance and merit. 6. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/9