Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17170 (KAR)

SMT RACHIPUTTAMMA v. SMT SANNAMMA

RSA/885/2012 · 2026-02-27

H T Narendra Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12305 RSA No. 885 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 885 OF 2012 (POS) BETWEEN: 1. SMT RACHIPUTTAMMA W/O LATE GOVINDAIAH AGED AOBUT 52 YEARS SINCE DECEASED REP. BY HER LRS 2. SRI SRINIVASA S/O LATE GOVINDAIAH AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS LR OF APPELLANT NO.1 3. SRI DINESHA S/O LATE GOVINDAIAH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS LR OF APPELLANT NO.1 4. SRI PRAKASH S/O LATE GOVINDAIAH AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS LR OF APPELLANT NO.1 ALL ARE R/AT DOOR NO. 1975/2 NEW NO. 61/2,ASHOKAPURAM MYSORE-01. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. GIRIDHAR H, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12305 RSA No. 885 of 2012 AND: SMT SANNAMMA W/O PUTTASWAMY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT DOOR NO. 1960 NEW NO. A 32/1, 11TH CROSS, ASHOKAPURAM, MYSORE-01. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. J K SHESHAGIRI RAO., ADVOCATE) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC PRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPEAL BY SETTING SIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED: 03.01.2012 PASSED BY THE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT MYSORE IN REGULAR APPEAL NO.338/2011 AND CONFIRM THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED IN OS. NO. 233/05 BY THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, MYSORE, DATED: 11.04.2011. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDER, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT 1. None appears for the appellants. 2. This Court, by order dated 12.07.2024, granted two weeks’ time to file the paper book, subject to payment of costs of Rs.500/- payable to the High Court Legal Services Committee. Till today, the paper book has not been filed and the cost has also not been paid. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12305 RSA No. 885 of 2012 3. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. 4. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE HA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23