[2026:JHHC:17714] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5444 of 2026 ------ Irfan Shekh @ Farukh Shekh, Aged about 22 years, Son of Ekram Shekh, Resident of – Village Begampura, P.O. Koyla Bazar (Rajmahal), P.S.- Rajmahal, District- Sahibganj .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ashutosh Kr. Sinha, Advocate Ms. Savita Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-18-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No.102 of 2026 arising out of Rajmahal P.S. Case No.01 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 103 (1) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed the murder of the father of the informant namely Kaila Pahariya. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para- 13 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion and the petitioner leading to recovery of one blood strained Hackshaw Blade and except the confessional statement of the petitioner leading to recovery of the alleged weapon of offence, there is no other material in the record to implicate in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 31.12.2025 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Rajmahal in connection with S.T. Case No.102 of 2026 arising out of Rajmahal P.S. Case No.01 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-18.06.2026-Animesh/