2026:CGHC:12410 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2452 of 2026 Arjun Kumar Dewangan S/o Shri Anandram Dewangan Aged About 51 Years R/o Village/post Raja Khujji, P.S. Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh Pin Code 491661 ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe Development, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Commissioner Department Of Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe Development, Block - 4d, Ground Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Collector Office Of The Collectorate, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh 4 - The Assistant Commissioner Department Of Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe Development, Block - 4d, Ground Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 5 - The Chairman Hostel Advisory Committee Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Kumar Barik, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajay Kumrani, P.L. HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE PARTH PRATEEM SAHU Order on Board 16/03/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs; “10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for entire records pertaining to the case of petitioners for kind perusal of this Hon'ble court. 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned transfer order 15/09/2025 (Annexure P-1) and direct the respondent No. 4 not to disturb the petitioner and take back to Dongargarh, Rajnandgaon. 10.3 Any other relief, which may be deemed, fit by this Hon'ble Court just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be provided in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing this writ petition on merits, however, he is only seeking a direction to respondent No. 2 and 4 to consider and take decision on the representation submitted by the petitioner, at the earliest, within specified time frame. 3. Counsel for the State submits that in view of the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, he is having no objection. 4. On due consideration of submission of counsel for the parties, the writ petition, at this stage, is disposed of permitting the petitioner to submit fresh comprehensive representation before respondent No. 2 and 4, and if such a representation is submitted, the concerned authorities shall consider and take decision, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation. 5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) JUDGE Saurabh