Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1717 (BOM)

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD Through its Authorised Signatory Mrs Smita Bhosale v. DEVIKA SASIDHARAN

CARAP/161/2026 · 2026-08-21

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

9-IA-3326-2026.DOC ARP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3326 OF 2026 IN COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 161 OF 2026 Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd Through Its Authorised Signatory Mrs. Smita Bhosale ...Applicant Versus Devika Sasidharan ...Respondent Mr. Omkar Shere i/b Vikrant Sabne & Associates, for the Applicant. None for the Respondent. CORAM ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATED: 10th JULY 2026 PC:- INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3326 OF 2026: 1. This is an application for restoration of Commercial Arbitration Application No.161 of 2026. It appears from the record that on 29th April 2026, none appeared for the Applicant. Thereafter, on 30th April 2026, since none appeared on behalf of the Applicant, the Commercial Arbitration Application was dismissed for non-prosecution. 2. The learned counsel for the Application submits that the matter was inadvertently missed by the learned advocate, due to which he could not remain present. The present Interim 10th July 2026 9-IA-3326-2026.DOC Application for restoration is filed upon noticing that the Commercial Arbitration Application has been dismissed. 3. Commercial Arbitration Application No.161 of 2026 is restored its original file and record subject to the payment of costs of Rs.2,500/- with the High Court Advocates' Association. 4. The present Interim Application is allowed and disposed of accordingly. COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 161 OF 2026: 5. Issue notice to Respondent, returnable on 7th August 2026. (ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.) 10th July 2026