Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17167 (RAJ)

DURGADUTT @ DURGA THROUGH LRS v. KESHAR SON OF SHRI BIRJU @ BRAJLAL

CW/4194/2021 · 2026-01-13

Maneesh Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:1298] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4194/2021 1. Durgadutt @ Durga S/o late Shri Bhaniram, R/o Basawa, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Since Deceased) through his legal heirs:- 1/1 Sushil Kumar S/o Shri Durgadutt, R/o Shop No.57, Abhishek Market, Ring Road, Surat Gujrat 1/2. Shravankumar S/o Late Shri Durgadutt, R/o Shop No.74, Abhishek Market, Ring Road, Surat Gujrat 1/3. Shashikant S/o Shri Durgadutt, R/o B-304, Kailash Mansarowar Opposite Garden Court, Near Kasturi Garden, Behind Maiksas Mal, Post Bhayendar West Mumbai 1/4. Rakesh Kumar S/o Late Shri Durgadutt, R/o Shop No.74, Abhishek Market, Ring Road, Surat Gujrat 1/5. Smt. Sarla Devi D/o Late Shri Durgadutt W/o Santoshkumar, R/o Kiran Aayar Store, Sadar Bazar, Gudha Godji Ka Tehsil Udaipurwati District Jhunjhunu (Raj) ----Petitioners Versus 1. Keshar S/o Shri Birju @ Brajlal, R/o Bharuka Enterprises, Ganiyari Road, Vedan, District Sindhi, Madhya Pradesh 2. Chhedilal S/o Late Shri Ramkumar, Farm Ramkumar Chhedilal G.T. Road, Mugalsaray At Present District Chandoli, Madhya Pradesh. 3. Shyamlal S/o Late Late Bhagirath grandson Late Shri Ramkumar, R/o Behind G.T. Petrol Pump, Laxmi Dal Meel, Mugalsaray At Present District Chandoli Madhya Pradesh. 4. Hariprasad 5. Basant Kumar 6. Mahesh Kumar Sons of Late Shri Mahaveer Prasad grandson of Late Shri Ramkumar, R/o G.T. Road, Mugalsaray At Present District Chandoli. 7. Pawan Kumar S/o Late Shri Kanshiprasad grandson of Late Shri Ramkumar, 8. Sanjay Kumar S/o Late Shri Kanshiprasad grandson of Late Shri Ramkumar, Both residents of Firm Ramkumar Bhagirathmal, Lakadi Ke Vyapari, Mugalsaray G.T. Road At Present District Chandoli Madhya Pradesh. 9. Shivkumar Murarka S/o Shri Ramswaroop Murarka, R/o Gopinath Ka Mandir, Nawalgarh, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj) 10. Smt. Sulochana Widow of Late Shri Radheyshyam, 11. Ajay Kumar [2026:RJ-JP:1298] (2 of 3) [CW-4194/2021] 12. Pankaj Kumar 13. Niranjan Kumar 14. Sandeep Kumar Sons of Late Shri Radheshyam, R/o Agarwal Vastralaya, G.T. Road, Mugalsaray At Present Chandoli, Madhya Pradesh 15. Bihari Lal S/o Late Shri Bajranglal grandson of Late Shri Bhaniram, R/o Basawa, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu At Present 7/30, Chauth Mala Mahesh Goregaon Mumbai 16. State of Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shantanu Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar Bhardwaj HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 13/01/2026 In Application (IA No.1/2025):- 1. Matter has come up on application filed for withdrawal of the present writ petition on the basis of compromise/settlement. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions of his client, submits that the dispute between the parties has been resolved by way of amicable settlement, therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. 3. Permission sought for is granted and for the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. 4. The present civil writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. All pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. In Application (IA No.1/2021):- [2026:RJ-JP:1298] (3 of 3) [CW-4194/2021] 1. Matter has come up on application filed for vacation of ex- parte interim order dated 29.06.2021 passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the dismissal of the writ petition, the present application become infructuous. 3. In view of the above, the application (IA No.1/2021) is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. In Application (IA No.1/2024):- 1. Matter has come up on application filed for impeading the subsequent purchaser namely Sh. Krishan Gopal Sharma S/o Ghasi Ram Sharma from respondent No.9-Shiv Kumar Murarka. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the main petition has already been disposed of, therefore, he is not willing to press the present application for impleadment. 3. In view of the above, the present application is dismissed as not pressed. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-231