APHC010079752026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5106/2026 Between: 1. MASA RAMADASU, S/O PAMPADI, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCCUPATION CULTIVATION, R/O HAMSAVARAM VILLAGE, TUNI MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. MASA SARASWATHI,, W/O MASA RAMADASU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. OCCUPATION HOUSEWIFE, R/O HAMSAVARAM VILLAGE, TUNI MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. SAKA SURYAPRAKASH,, D/O YESU BABU, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O HAMSAVARAM VILLAGE, TUNI MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522238. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522503. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA DISTRICT, KAKINADA, ANDHRA PRADESH - 533001. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TUNI RURAL POLICE STATION, TUNI MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 533001. 2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5106 of 2026 Dated 23.02.2026 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of Respondents authorities in harassing the petitioners calling to the police station to settle the cases out of the court in respect of their property bearing Sy. No. 361/1A, admeasuring 290.4 Sq. Yards (243.93 Sq. Meters) situated at Hamsavaram Village, Tuni Mandal, Kakinada District, despite the petitioner got the injunction order in OS NO 264 of 2025 in lA NO 326 of 2025 dated 19.09.2025 is as illegal, unjust, arbitrary and amounts to infringement of the Petitioners' fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities not to interfere over the property disputes situated in Sy. No. 361/1A, admeasuring 290.4 Sq. Yards (243.93 Sq. Meters) situated at Hamsavaram Village, Tuni Mandal, Kakinada District and to pass….” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Sri J.Sravan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that respondents’ police have been continuously calling the petitioners to the police station and subjecting them to harassment, which is violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. 3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5106 of 2026 Dated 23.02.2026 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that the police called the petitioners only for the purpose of enquiry in connection with Crime No.293 of 2025 under section 329 (3), 324 (4) r/w 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity, ‘the BNS’) and section 3 of Prevention of public property damage Act of Tuni Rural Police Station, Kakinada District, and were never unnecessarily summoned to the police station. 5. Considering the above submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents’ authorities not to call the petitioners further to the police station unnecessarily without following the due process of law and not to interfere in civil disputes pending in between the parties. 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 23.02.2026 PBS 4 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5106 of 2026 Dated 23.02.2026 66 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5106 of 2026 Date: 23.02.2026 PBS