KANHAI LAL S/O SHRI-ROSHAN LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/3024/2026 · 2026-02-17
Anand Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17160 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17160 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:7564] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3024/2026 Kanhai Lal S/o Shri-Roshan Lal, Aged About 47 Years, R/o- Ward No-1, Harsauli, Alwar, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, P.h.q Lalkothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan
3. Inspector General Of Police, Jaipur Range, Jaipur.
4. Superintendent Of Police, Distt.alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naveen Dhuwan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shubham Sharma, Adv. for Mr. Somitra Chaturvedi, Dy. GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 17/02/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in exercise of powers under Rule 13 of Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958, the petitioner has been placed under suspension vide order dated 15.10.2025. He submits that although, more than 4 months has expired, yet till this date, even charge-sheet has not been issued to the petitioner, however, his suspension is still continuing and the respondents have not reviewed the suspension order.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon the
judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Ajay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Union of India & Anr. (2015) 7 SCC 291,
[2026:RJ-JP:7564] (2 of 2) [CW-3024/2026] wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has directed that in the cases where the suspension has been continued for more than 3 months and charge-sheet has not been issued, the Government is under an obligation to review the suspension order.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a limited prayer that the respondents be directed to review the suspension
order in the light of judgment of Ajay Kumar Choudhary (Supra).
4. Mr. Shubham Sharma, Adv. for Mr. Somitra Chaturvedi, Dy. GC appears and accepts notices on behalf of the respondents.
5. In view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation before Superintendent of Police, District Alwar for seeking review of suspension order and in case, such representation is received, Superintendent of Police, Alwar is directed to consider the same and pass speaking order within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of representation along with copy of this order.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
7. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /41