ARUN BARUA v. MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE ASSAM FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND ANR
I.A.(Civil)/2988/2025 · 2026-01-04
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17160 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17160 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010202252025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2988/2025 ARUN BARUA S/O- LAKHIRAM BARUA, PRO- M/S BARUA PAT SILK INDUSTRY, VILL- GARAAL, P.O. BAHATTAPARA, MIRZA, DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM VERSUS MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE ASSAM FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND ANR GUWAHATI BRANCH, H.O. NITTIYA BHAVAN, M.D. SHAH ROAD, PALTANBAZAR, GUWAHATI-8.
2:DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER GUWAHATI THE ASSAM FINANCIAL CORPORATION BRANCH OFFICE DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR R M DAS, MR. C SHARMA,MS. R DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : , Linked Case : WP(C)/4722/2025 ARUN BARUA S/O- LAKHIRAM BARUA PRO- M/S BARUA PAT SILK INDUSTRY VILL- GARAAL P.O. BAHATTAPARA
Page No.# 2/3 MIRZA DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM VERSUS MANAGING DIRECTOR THE ASSAM FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND ANR GUWAHATI BRANCH H.O. NITTIYA BHAVAN M.D. SHAH ROAD PALTANBAZAR GUWAHATI-8.
2:DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER GUWAHATI THE ASSAM FINANCIAL CORPORATION BRANCH OFFICE DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR R M DAS Advocate for : SC FINANCE appearing for MANAGING DIRECTOR THE ASSAM FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND ANR
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 05.01.2026 Heard Ms. R. Deka, learned counsel for the applicant/writ petitioner, who by means of this application has prayed for a correction of a typographical error which crept in the order dated 20.08.2025. It is submitted that the subject matter of challenge was an order dated 03.07.2025 which was stayed by this Court. However, the aforesaid order dated 03.07.2025 was inadvertently written as 30.07.2025 in the second last paragraph instead of 03.07.2025.
Page No.# 3/3 Perused the materials on record, including the writ petition. It clearly appears that the impugned order is dated 03.07.2025 and by inadvertence, the same has been wrongly written as 30.07.2025 in the second last paragraph of the order dated
20.08.2025. This Court has also observed that in the earlier part of the order, the date of the impugned order has been correctly written as 03.07.2025. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the instant IA is allowed and the date of the impugned order appearing as 30.07.2025 in the order dated 20.08.2025 is to be read as 03.07.2025. The interlocutory application stands disposed of. Let this order be read as a part of the order dated 20.08.2025 passed in the connected WP(C)/4722/2025. JUDGE Comparing Assistant