Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17160 (DEL)

PRAVESH YADAV v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

W.P.(C)/12591/2026 · 2026-08-31

C Hari Shankar, Vinod Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(C) 12591/2026 p. 1 $~60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010406102026 + W.P.(C) 12591/2026, CM APPL. 58378/2026, CM APPL. 58379/2026 & CM APPL. 58380/2026 PRAVESH YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Gupta, Mr. Prateek Gupta, Ms. Manaswee Gupta, Ms. Shipra Bhardwaj, Mr. Ravi, Ms. Sowmya China and Ms. Vaishnavi Mishra, Advs. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION .....Respondent Through: Mrs. Anubha Bhardwaj, SPP with Ms. Ananya Shamshery, Ms. Manavi Dhingra and Mr. Sparsh Sharma, Advs. with Mr. Praveen Rawat, IO for CBI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR ORDER (ORAL) % 31.08.2026 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. The grievance of the petitioner in this case is that, despite order dated 25 September 2025, passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, whereby the Central Administrative Tribunal1 was directed to dispose of the OA 1724/2021 within three months, the matter is yet to be heard. 2. After some hearing, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks 1 “Tribunal” hereinafter W.P.(C) 12591/2026 p. 2 leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to move an application before the Tribunal for expedited hearing of the OA, enclosing a copy of the order dated 25 September 2025 passed by this Court. 3. We have no doubt once the attention of the Tribunal is drawn to the order dated 25 September 2025 of this Court, it would make every effort to comply with para 6 thereof. 4. The petition is accordingly disposed of in the aforesaid terms. C. HARI SHANKAR, J VINOD KUMAR, J AUGUST 31, 2026/AR