ANAND SURANA v. The Office of the Electricity Ombudsman,
WPC/793/2026 · 2026-02-22
Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17159 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17159 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:9191
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 793 of 2026 Anand Surana S/o Lt. Shri Devraj Singh Surana, Aged About 67 Years R/o Beside Idbi Bank, Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.)
... Petitioner. Versus 1 - The Office Of The Electricity Ombudsman, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulator Commissions Campus Irrigation Colony, Shanti Nagar, Raipur C.G. 2 - Rajendra Surana S/o Late Shri Devraj Singh Surana, Aged About 59 Years R/o 36/395, Guru Nanesh Kripa, Near Idbi Bank, Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Office Of Executive Engineer, (O And M), Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd., Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur C.G.
... Respondents. (cause title downloaded from CIS Periphery) For Petitioner : Mr. Adhiraj Surana, Advocate.
For Res/CSPDCL : Mr. Manoj Khare, Adv on behalf of Mr. Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate. (Hon’ble Shri Justice
Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
) Order on Board
23/02/2026 Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI DN: cn=AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ou=HIGH COURT, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN Date: 2026.02.24 10:23:31 +0530
2
1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh better constituted petition, if occasion so arises.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent does not oppose the aforesaid prayer.
3. Having considered the aforesaid submission, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving the liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ajay