::1:: APHC010078852025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 465/2025 Between: 1. D SREENIVASULU, S/O D. JAYARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, PRESIDENT, WUA, BRAHMADEVAM OCC. CONTRACTOR, R/O BRAHMADEVAM, MUTHUKUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI G SAI PRASAD I A S, SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION (WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PIYUSH KUMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI S DESI NAYAK, THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION CIRCLE NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT. ::2:: 4. SRI K NAGARAJU, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, NELLORE CENTRAL DIVISION NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. SRI P RAVI PRAKASH I A S, C.E.O., CFMS, 6TH FLOOR, C-BLOCK, ANJANEYA TOWERS IBRAHIMPATNAM KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the contemnors/respondents under the provisions of section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willfully, wantonly and deliberately violated the order dated 19-12-2023 made in W.P.No.22065 of 2023 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. AKKEM SRIHARIVIRAT Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. RAMAKRISHNA PATIVADA ::3:: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA C.C.No.465 of 2025 This Court made the following ORDER: As learned counsel for respondents filed written instructions dated 30.03.2026 stating that the orders of this Court have been complied with, the matter was passed over after lunch for confirmation or instructions of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Even after lunch, there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. In view of compliance reported vide written instructions dated 30.03.2026 furnished by Respondent No.4, no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 3. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 30.03.2026 krk ::4:: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA C.C.No.465 of 2025 30.03.2026 krk 91