[2026:RJ-JP:5225] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No.59/2025 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11285/2024 Bhagirath Singh S/o Shri Moti Singh Shekhawati, Aged About 69 Years, R/o Shekhawato Ki Kothi, Vpo Bagar, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, School Education And Bhasha Department, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner. 3. The District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Jhunjhunu. 4. B.l. Education Trust, Bagar, District Jhunjhunu Through Its Secretary Pramod Gangwal, R/o Plot No. 47/11, Kiran Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajanand Yadav JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 04/02/2026 1. The matter comes up on misc. application No.59/2025 seeking extension of time to file appeal/application before the Appellate Tribunal in terms of the order dated 20.09.2024 while deciding S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11285/2024. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner (for short “the applicant”) submits that the aforesaid writ petition submitted by the applicant was disposed of vide order dated 20.09.2024 on the [2026:RJ-JP:5225] (2 of 3) [WMAP-59/2025] ground that the applicant has alternative remedy of filing an appeal before the Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions Tribunal (for short “the Tribunal”) in light of the provisions of the Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions Act, 1989 (for short “the Act of 1989”). Learned counsel submits that a liberty was granted to the applicant to submit an appeal within a period of one month from the date of the aforesaid order and a further direction was issued to the Tribunal to decide the same, expeditiously as early as possible, strictly in accordance with law. 3. Learned counsel submits that after obtaining the certified copy of the aforesaid order, the same was misplaced, hence, the order could not be communicated to the applicant, hence, delay has occurred in filing the appeal, therefore, time of one month granted by this Court for filing an appeal be extended. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on the record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by learned counsel for the applicant and facts and circumstances narrated above, the instant misc. application stands allowed and one month further time is granted to the applicant to file an appeal before the Tribunal. 6. In case, such appeal/application is preferred by the applicant within the above stipulated time, it is expected from the Tribunal to decide the same, expeditiously as early as possible, strictly in accordance with law. [2026:RJ-JP:5225] (3 of 3) [WMAP-59/2025] 7. This order shall be treated as part and parcel of the order dated 20.09.2024 passed by this Court while deciding S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11285/2024. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/24