IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27661 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-241 Year-2025 Thana- RAMGARHWA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Ravindra Kumar @ Ravindra Yadav Son of Sudama Yadav @ Suman Yadav Resident of village - Pachbhediya, P.S.- Ramgarhwa, District - East Champaran 2. Sudami Devi Wife of Sudama Yadav Resident of village - Pachbhediya, P.S.- Ramgarhwa, District - East Champaran 3. Sudama Yadav Son of Late Shivmangal Yadav Resident of village - Pachbhediya, P.S.- Ramgarhwa, District - East Champaran 4. Rinki Devi Daughter of Sudama Yadav Resident of village - Pachbhediya, P.S.- Ramgarhwa, District - East Champaran 5. Khushnan Yadav @ Khusman Yadav Son of Chokat Yadav Resident of village - Pachbhediya, P.S.- Ramgarhwa, District - East Champaran 6. Chhotelal @ Chhotelal Yadav Son of Dukha Yadav Resident of village - Gudra, P.S.- Majhauliya, District - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 11-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. This is second anticipatory bail application on behalf of the petitioners. Earlier, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners was rejected on merit vide order dated 13.03.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 76488 of 2025. 3. This application does not reveal any new facts and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27661 of 2026(2) dt.11-05-2026 2/2 circumstances for reconsideration of prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. In view of the recent judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of G.R. Ananda Babu Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr. reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 176, this second anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioners is not maintainable. 4. This application is, accordingly, dismissed. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T