Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17153 (KAR)

SMT. K MEERA BAI v. SRI. P VISHWANATH

CCC/854/2024 · 2026-03-12

Anu Sivaraman, Tara Vitasta Ganju

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14915-DB CCC No. 854 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 854 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SMT. K.MEERA BAI D/O LATE B.M.KRISHNAJI RAO, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1054, ‘SRIVARI’, GARUDACHAR LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGARA 3RD STAGE, MYSORE-570 017. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. SUBRAMANYA BHAT.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. P.VISHWANATH SECRETARY, VIDYAVARDHAKA SANGHA (R), SHESHADRI IYER ROAD, MYSORE-570 001. 2. DR. P.DEEPU PRINCIPAL, VIDYAVARDHAKA LAW COLLEGE, SHESHADRI IYER ROAD, MYSORE-570 021. …ACCUSED (BY SRI. VARDHAMAN.V.GUNJAL., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SUMATHY KANNAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14915-DB CCC No. 854 of 2024 THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR HAVING DELIBERATELY DISOBEYED THE ORDER DATED 29.05.2024 MADE IN WA NO.5099/2016 (ANNEXURE-C) AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN & HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the complainant. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent - accused submits that the memo for tendering of Demand Draft has been handed over to the learned counsel appearing for the complainant. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14915-DB CCC No. 854 of 2024 3. The learned counsel appearing for the complainant submits that the Contempt of Court Case can be closed by recording the same. 4. In the above view of the matter, the memo is taken on record and the Contempt of Court Case is accordingly closed. 5. Notice, if any, issued shall stand discharged. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE YKL List No.: 3 Sl No.: 43