Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17153 (JHR)

SARJAM BODRA @ SARJOM BODRA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5426/2026 · 2026-06-18

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:17760 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5426 of 2026 ------ Sarjam Bodra @ Sarjom Bodra, aged about 31 years, son of Mahati Bodra, resident of village –Jorapokhar, P.O. and P.S. – Jhinkpani, District –Singhbhum (West). … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 18.06.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Gua (Bara Jamda O.P.) P.S. Case No.36 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. No. 354 of 2025, S.T. Case No. 02 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 109(1), 118(2), 126(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner attempted to murder the informant –Vivek Sundi. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he has been in custody since 11.08.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 15 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the injuries sustained by the informant are simple in nature as has been mentioned in the order dated 16.02.2026, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa in Misc. Criminal Application No. 73 of 2026. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa, in connection with Gua (Bara Jamda O.P.) P.S. Case No.36 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. No. 354 of 2025, S.T. Case No. 02 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 18.06.2026 Sonu/