Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17152 (RAJ)

RAFIQ MOHAMMAD v. SMT MANJU DEVI AND OTHERS

CMA/3117/2010 · 2026-02-03

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3117/2010 Rafiq Mohammad S/o Shri Yasin Khan, R/o Gawanion Ka Mohalla, Bagru, District Jaipur Owner Of The Car No. Rj-14-Cc-1100 ----Appellant Versus 1. Smt. Manju Devi W/o Late Devkaran, R/o Village And Post Kuchil Via- Kishangarh, Police Station Kishangarh, District Ajmer 2. Master Chintu S/o Late Shri Devkaran Raigar Minor Through Natural Guardian And Mother Smt. Manju De, R/o Village And Post Kuchil Via- Kishangarh, Police Station Kishangarh, District Ajmer 3. Ku. Divya @ Sannu D/o Late Shri Devkaran Minor Through Natural Guardian And Mother Smt. Manju Devi, R/o Village And Post Kuchil Via- Kishangarh, Police Station Kishangarh, District Ajmer 4. Mohammad Sarif S/o Shri Shyoji @ Safi Mohammad, R/o Ramner Road, Madanganj, Kishangarh District Ajmer 5. National Insurance Company Ltd. Through Divisional Manager, Patwari Bhawar, Kachahari Road, Ajmer Insurance Company Of Car No. Rj-14-Cc-1100 ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3163/2010 Rafiq Mohammad S/o Shri Yasin Khan Musalman, R/o Gawarion Ka Mohalla, Bagru District Jaipur. Owner Of Car No. Rj-14Cc-1100 ----Appellant Versus 1. Rakesh Kuamr S/o Shri Gokul Chand, R/o Krishnapuri Madanganj, Kishangarh District Ajmer. 2. Mohammad Sarif S/o Shri Shyoji Alias Safi Mohammad Musalman, R/o Ramner Road, Madanganj Kishangarh District Ajmer. 3. National Insurance Company Ltd., Through Divisional Manager Patwari Bhawar, Kachahari Road, Ajmer. (2 of 2) [CMA-3117/2010] Insurance Company Of Car No. Rj-14-Cc-1100 ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Ms. Khushboo Sharma for Mr. Digvijay Mantri For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vinod Tyagi through VC Mr. Abhishek for Mr. Pradeep Sharma JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 03/02/2026 Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the parties have settled their dispute by entering into a compromise before the Tribunal. Hence, under these circumstances, no cause of action survives with the appellant to continue with these appeals. Considering the above, both misc. appeals stand dismissed as rendered infructuous. Stay applications and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/30-31