Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17152 (AP)

GANDLA BALAJI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/3963/2025 · 2026-02-25

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010076822025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3963/2025 Between: 1. GANDLA BALAJI, S/O .GANDIA NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, LICENSEE OF M/S.BALAJI WINES, R/O. D.NO.3-38, KOTA, KODIKONDA VILLAGE, CHILLAMATHURU MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE (EXCISE-LL) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF PROHIBITION AND EXCISE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA AT KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF PROHIBITION AND EXCISE, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 4. DISTRICT PROHIBITION AND EXCISE OFFICER, PUTTAPARTHY, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ 2 or direction declaring the proceedings of the 4th respondent issued in RC.No.17/2025/B dated ,02.2025 signed on 05.02.2025 as illegal, arbitrary and one without power and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to conduct the business and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to pernhit the petitioner to conduct the business by suspending the proceedings of the 4th respondent issued in RC.No.17/2025/B dated .02.2025 signed on 05.02.2025, pending disposal of the Writ petition. IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to grant leave to the Respondents to file Counter Affidavit and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. O M R LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3963/2025 ORDER: Sri P. Jagga Reddy, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for petitioner, sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 26.02.2026 SCH 4 118 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3963/2025 Date: 26.02.2026 SCH