Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010079472019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 3517/2019 Between:
1. KUNCHALA SUBBA REDDY, S/O CHINA SUBBA REDDY, AGE 55 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O CHINTHA PUTTAYAPALLI VILLAGE, BADVEL MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. KUNCHALA RADHAMMA, W/O KUNCHALA SUBBA REDDY, AGE 52 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O CHINTHA PUTTAYAPALLI VILLAGE, BADVEL MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P.SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, RAJAMPET, Y.S.R.KADAPA DSTRICT
4. THE TAHASILDAR, BADVEL MANDAL, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toTo issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaringthe action of the Respondents herein in
2 JS,J W.P.No.3517/2019
attempting to dispossess the petitioners and also attempted to demolish the petitioners' house high handedly situtated in an extent of Ac.0.02 cents in Survey No.1161/1 situated at Chinthaputtayapalli Village, Badwel Mandal, Kadapa District without issuing any notice and without conducting any enquiry and without any authority as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, against to the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India particularly Art.300A, apart from violation of principles of natural justice and to consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners' property without following due process of law and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners' house situtated in an extent of Ac.0.02 cents in Survey No.1161/1 situated at Chinthaputtayapalli Village, Badwel Mandal, Kadapa District pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. A S C BOSE Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
3 JS,J W.P.No.3517/2019
The Court made the following ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2.
During the course of hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record the written instructions of the Tahsildar, Badvel Mandal dated Nil, which indicates clearly that the respondents are not interfering with the petitioners’ peaceful possession and enjoyment of the site in an extent of Ac.00.02 cents in Survey No.1161/1 situated at Chinthaputtayapalli Village, Badwel Mandal, Kadapa District. 3. In reply, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in view of the instructions and the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. 4. Recording submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of by making interim orders passed earlier, absolute. However, this order shall not preclude the respondent authorities from initiating any proceedings or taking action in accordance with law, following the due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________
JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 17.03.2026
RSD
4 JS,J W.P.No.3517/2019
32 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 3517/2019
Dated: 17.03.2026
RSD