Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17147 (KAR)

MR. VIJAYA. R v. THE STAET BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

CRL.P/16638/2025 · 2026-04-27

M I Arun

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23432 CRL.P No. 16638 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 16638 OF 2025 BETWEEN: MR. VIJAYA. R S/O. MR. RUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS R/AT DURGAMMA BEEDI ASHOKANAGARA-I YEDEHALLI POST BHADRAVATHI TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 227 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.A.PRAKASH.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STAET BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE HOLEHONNUR POLICE STATION REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 001 2. SMT.NAGAMMA MOTHER OF VICTIM AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT ASHOKA NAGARA-1 YEDEHALLI POST Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23432 CRL.P No. 16638 of 2025 BHADRAVATHI TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577227 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.AYUB ALI KHAN., ADDL.SPP FOR R1; SRI.SANTHOSH.S.KONANAVAR.,ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 438 CR.PC (FILED U/S 482 BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE ACCUSED / PETITIONER HEREIN ON ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN CONNECTION WITH CR.NO.279/2025 ON THE FILE OF ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE FTSC-1 (POCSO) SHIVAMOGGA, UNDER SEC.87,127(4),64(2)(M) OF BNS ACT, 2023 AND SEC.6 OF THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012 AND UNDER SEC.9 OF THE PROHIBITION OF CHILD MARRIAGE ACT, 2006 OF RESPONDENT - HOLEHONNUR POLICE STATION (ANNEXURE-B) ON ANY TERMS AND CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT AND ALLOW THIS PETITION AS PRAYED FOR, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23432 CRL.P No. 16638 of 2025 ORAL ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the bail petition has become infructuous, as the petitioner has been subsequently arrested by the police. Hence, the same stands dismissed. SD/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE CH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 73