IN T 116 Joga Singh Joginder Si CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU judgments a the respond Agreement decreed by b appellant, o parties. It i present appe January 20 Vijay Asija Whether spe Whether Rep IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Regular Second Appeal No.2672 Date of decision :-20.01.2026 Singh Versus der Singh AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Munish Gupta, Advocate for the appellant. I GUPTA J. (Oral) The defendant is in second ap ents and decrees of the learned District spondent/plaintiff for possession by wa ment to Sell dated 23.12.2011 and for p ed by both the learned Courts below. At the very outset, it is submitte lant, on oral instructions, that the matte s. It is accordingly prayed that he may nt appeal. Dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, sh 20, 2026 Asija er speaking/reasoned Yes / No er Reportable Yes / No UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH o.2672 of 2023 (O & M) …..Appellant …..Respondent NIDHI GUPTA ond appeal against the concurrent istrict Courts whereby suit filed by by way of Specific Performance of for permanent injunction has been bmitted by learned counsel for the matter stands settled between the may be permitted to withdraw the any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.21 17.41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document