Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17143 (HP)

CHHOTU RAM v. STATE OF HP

CRMPM/1160/2026 · 2026-07-22

Virender Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:30231 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Cr.MP (M) No. :     1160 of 2026 Decided on     :   22nd July 2026 Chhotu Ram …Applicant Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh,  Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the applicant      :  Mr. K.S. Gill, Advocate. For the respondent   : Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocates General, with Ms. Ranjna Patial, Deputy Advocate General. Virender Singh, Judge (Oral) Applicant – Chhotu Ram, has filed the present application, under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha   Sanhita,   2023   (hereinafter   referred   to   as   the 'BNSS'), with a prayer to release him on bail, during the pendency   of   trial,   in   case  FIR   No.207   of   2024,   dated 25.08.2024,   registered,   under  Sections   103,   3(5)   and 127(2)   of   the   Bharatiya   Nyaya   Sanhita,   2023 1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 2026:HHC:30231 (hereinafter   referred   to   as   the   ‘BNS’),   with   Police Station Baddi, District Solan, H.P. 2. According   to   the   applicant,   he   is   innocent person and has falsely been implicated and arrested, in the present case. 3. As   per   the   applicant,   he   is   in   custody   from 27.08.2024   and   investigation,   in   the   present   case,   is complete. As such, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant, in judicial custody. 4. It   is   the   further   case   of   the   applicant   that initially, the FIR, was registered against unknown persons, however,   the   applicant   was   implicated   on   the   basis   of disclosure statements made by other co­accused. 5. The applicant has sought the relief of bail on the ground of parity as his  co­accused Ajay Kumar, Ram Karan,   Prakash   Kumar   and   Yog   Raj   have   already   been released, on bail, by this Court. 6. On the basis of the above facts, learned counsel for the applicant has given certain undertakings, on behalf of the applicant, to which, the applicant is ready to abide by, in case he is ordered to be released on bail. 3 2026:HHC:30231 7. The applicant has also tried his luck, by moving similar application, before this Court, however, the same was dismissed as withdrawn, on 09.10.2025. Thereafter, the applicant has filed similar application before the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nalagarh, however, the same was dismissed on 08.12.2025. 8. On the basis of the above facts, a prayer has been made to allow the application. 9. When   put   to   notice,   the   police   has   filed   the status   report   disclosing   therein,   on   25.08.2024,   HC Amarjeet Singh No.48, I.O., had given the information qua the  fact that  he  noticed  two   persons;  one  was  lying   in injured condition and the other was lying unconscious, at a place known as Sandoli Khawadian and he was taking both the persons to CHC Baddi for treatment. 9.1. Thereafter,   Inspector/SHO,   along   with   other police   official,   reached   at   CHC   Baddi,   where   the   two persons were taken by the I.O.  Injured Lakshmi Kant was declared as fit to make statement, and was referred to PGI Chandigarh   for   further   treatment,   whereas,   the   other person namely Rahul Rai, was declared dead. 4 2026:HHC:30231 9.2. Statement   of   the   complainant   was   recorded under Section 173 BNSS, wherein, he had disclosed that he is resident of village Pawa, Tehsil Bustabad, District Unnav, UP and is residing in a rented accommodation at Panchkula, along with three other persons. Rahul is his friend. 9.3. On   25.08.2024,   all   the   four   persons   had boarded a bus and at about 3.30 p.m., they reached Baddi, where   the   companion   of   Rahul   had   gone   to   purchase Ganja. When Rahul was purchasing Ganja, then a scuffle took place with the person, who had allegedly sold Ganja to them, as Rahul had not paid the amount to him. The other party was from the locality, as such, they came there along with Dandas in their hands and all the four persons were beaten by them. 9.4. According   to   the   complainant,   the   assailants were not known to him, however, he could identify them, if produced before him. They all were stated to be of 22­27 years of age. 9.5. Thereafter,   the   police   registered   the   FIR,   in question and criminal machinery swung into motion. 5 2026:HHC:30231 10. During investigation, the spot was visited by the team of expert of FSL. Dead body of Rahul Rai was sent for postmortem examination to IGMC. After postmortem, the   dead   body   was   handed   over   to   the   relatives   for performing the last rites. 11. As per the further investigation, involvement of accused Chetan Singh, Ram Karan and Karan Kumar @ Soni was found. All the three were inquired and were arrested on 26.08.2024 at 7.35 p.m.   Since, complainant Lakshmi Kant had got recorded, in his statement, that the assailants   were   not   known   to   him,   as   such,   test identification parade was proposed to be conducted. 12. In   the   further   investigation,   accused   Nitin Kashyap, Sonu Kumar, Chhotu (applicant), Bablu Ahirwar, Shantanu,   and   Praveen,   were   arrested   on   27.08.2024. Thereafter,   on   30.08.2024,   accused   Ravi   Kumar   was arrested. On   01.09.2024,   accused   Ajay   Kumar   was produced   before   the   I.O.,   he   was   also   arrested   on 1.09.2024. All the accused, who were arrested, in this case,   their   faces   were   muffled   to   conceal   their identification. 6 2026:HHC:30231 13. Thereafter,   on   4.9.2024,   accused   Rahul   @ Happy, was arrested. On 7.9.2024, accused Rahul Kumar has identified the place of occurrence. The said fact was documented. On 10.09.2024, accused Sonu Kumar, also made   statement   under   Section   23   of   the  Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the BSA’)   and   got   recovered   bamboo   stick,   which   was   also taken into possession. Similarly, accused Karan Kumar @ Soni, has made the statement under Section 23 of the BSA and got recovered the  danda  which was also taken into possession. CDRs   of   mobile   numbers   of   the   accused persons were obtained. 14. On 14.09.2024, accused Prakash Kumar was also arrested. On 16.09.2024, accused Prakash Kumar got recovered a scanner, which was also taken into possession. On 18.09.2024, accused Lukesh @ Jassi was arrested. On 19.09.2024, accused Yograj was arrested. On 6.11.2024, accused Rakib was also arrested. 15. It is the further case of the Police that accused Ajay Kumar, along with his companion was found moving on motorcycle towards Katha and he was identified on the 7 2026:HHC:30231 basis of the CCTV Footage. However, Ajay Kumar was not found involved in the quarrel, which had taken place in the parking of Truck Union, Baddi. 16. On 04.09.2024, test identification parade was got conducted by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.2, Nalagarh, in which, the injured has identified 11 accused persons namely; Chetan Singh, Ram Karan, Karan Kumar, Nitin Kashyap, Sonu Kumar, Bablu Ahirvar, Shantanu,   Praveen   Kumar,   Chhotu   (applicant),   Ravi Kumar and Ajay Kumar. 17. Accused   Rahul   Kumar   has   been   arrested   on 04.09.2024   and   he   was   produced   before   the   Court   on 05.09.2024, from where, he was remanded to the police custody for five days. During the police custody, he has identified the place of alleged occurrence and the said fact was documented. 18. It has been mentioned, in the status report, that in   this   case,   as   per   the   investigation,   statements   of witnesses,   and   videos,   applicant   Chhotu,   along   with accused   Bablu   Ahirvar,   Rahul   Kumar   @   Happy,   Nitin Kashyap,  Anmol @ Tejua, and Ravi Kumar etc. had beaten 8 2026:HHC:30231 deceased Rahul Rai, Laxmikant, Ankush and Navneet @ Shiva, near Truck Union, Baddi and thereafter, accused Sonu took the injured in their vehicle to Katha near Coca Cola Company. 19. On the basis of the above facts, a prayer has been made to dismiss the bail application. 20. Heard. 21. Admittedly,   the   investigation,   in   the   present case, is complete and the case is now fixed for recording the statements of prosecution witnesses on 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 14, 16, 17, 21 and 22.09.2026. 22. Co­accused of the applicant, accused Yog Raj, Prakash Kumar and Rahul Kumar @ Happy,  have already been   released   on   bail   by   this   Court,   while   deciding Cr.MP(M) No.753 of 2025, on 7.7.2025, Cr.MP(M) No.70 of 2026, on 31.03.2026, and Cr.MP(M) No.1016 of 2026 on 03.07.2026, whereas, accused Lukesh @ Jassi has been released   by   the   learned   trial   Court   vide   order   dated 12.12.2025. 9 2026:HHC:30231 23. The role attributed to the applicant is almost the   same,   which   has   been   alleged   against   the   above persons. 24. The applicant, in the present case, has been arrested   on   27.08.2024   and   the   prosecution   has   yet examined only 12 witnesses and three were given up. Now, the   case   is   listed   for   recording   the   statements   of prosecution witnesses on 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 14, 16, 17, 21 and 22.09.2026. 25. Considering all these facts, this Court is of the view that the bail application is liable to be allowed and is accordingly allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on bail in case FIR No.207 of 2024, dated 25.08.2024, registered, under Sections 103, 3(5), and 127(2), of the BNS, with Police Station Baddi, District Solan, H.P., on his furnishing personal bond, in the sum of Rs.50,000/­, with one surety, in the like amount, to the satisfaction of learned trial Court. 26. This order of release, however, shall be subject to the following conditions :­ 10 2026:HHC:30231 “a)   Applicant shall make himself available for the purpose   of   investigation,   if   so   required   and regularly   attend   the   trial   Court   on   each   and every date of hearing and if prevented by any reason   to   do   so,   seek   exemption   from appearance by filing appropriate application; b) Applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence   nor   hamper   the   investigation   of   the case in any manner whatsoever; c)     Applicant shall not make any inducement, threat or promises to any person acquainted with the facts of   the case   so   as   to   dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or the Police Officer; and d) Applicant shall not leave the territory of India without the prior permission of the Court.” 27. Any of the observations made herein above shall not be taken as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case as these observations are confined only to the disposal of the present bail application. 28. It is made clear that the respondent­State is at liberty to move an appropriate application, in case, any of the   bail   conditions   is   found   to   be   violated   by   the   bail applicant. 29. The Registry is directed to forward a soft copy of the   bail   order   to   the   Superintendent   Jail,   Sub   Jail, 11 2026:HHC:30231 Kishanpura, District Solan through e­mail, with a direction to enter the date of grant of bail in the e­prison software. 30. In case, the applicant is not released within a period of seven   days   from   the   date   of   grant of bail, the   Superintendent   Jail,   Sub   Jail,   Kishanpura,   District Solan,   is   directed   to   inform   this   fact   to   the   Secretary, DLSA,   Solan. The   Superintendent   Jail,   Sub   Jail, Kishanpura, District Solan, is further directed that if the applicant fails to furnish the bail bonds, as per the order passed by this Court, within a period of one month from today, then, the said fact be submitted to this Court. ( Virender Singh ) Judge July 22, 2025(ps) PRADEEP Digitally signed by PRADEEP Date: 2026.07.22 17:52:18 +0530