Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17142 (CAL)

KRISHNA MADAL @ KRISHNA MANDAL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/235/2026 · 2026-02-20

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

20/02/2026 D/L – 34 Court No.28 S. Kundu C.R.M.(A) 235 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. In the matter of: Krishna Madal @ Krishna Mandal …Petitioner. Ms. Khusi Mollick Ms. Esha Basak …for the petitioner. Mr. Imran Ali Ms. Sima Biswas …for the State. 1. Learned counsels appearing for the petitioner and the State submit that the petitioner has already been arrested in this case. 2. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. The presence of the Investigating Officer is noted and is dispensed with. 4. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with requisite formalities. (Jay Sengupta, J.)