2026:JHHC:17736 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3166 of 2026 ------ Sunil Kumar, aged about 25 years, son of Bineshri Ram @ Bindeshwari Ram, Naudiha, P.O. and P.S. Chhattarpur, District Palamau, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner : Mr. Raj Nandan Chatterjee, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shashi Kumar Verma, A.P.P. ------ 02/18.06.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Chhatarpur P.S. Case No. 18 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 69 and 108 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Palamau at Daltonganj. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case and there is nothing to suggest that the petitioner has instigated the deceased to commit suicide. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the petitioner has established relationship with the deceased and later on, refused the marry and thereafter, she has committed suicide and even suicide note has been found from the place of occurrence. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. In the FIR it has been alleged that the petitioner has established relationship since last one year with the deceased and he has refused to marry and thereafter, the deceased has committed suicide and the suicide note has also been found. In view of that there is direct instigation against the petitioner of compelling her to take such step, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby, rejected. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Anit Uploaded 19.06.2026