Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010193282025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2900/2025 MUSTT ALEKA BANU AND ORS W/O LATE PYAR HUSSAIN RESIDENT OF RUPOHI TOWN MOUZA KHATOWAL DIST NAGAON (ASSAM) 2: MD. ASHADUL S/O LATE PYAR HUSSAIN RESIDENT OF RUPOHI TOWN MOUZA KHATOWAL DIST NAGAON (ASSAM) 3: MD. MUKSHADUL S/O LATE PYAR HUSSAIN RESIDENT OF RUPOHI TOWN MOUZA KHATOWAL DIST NAGAON (ASSAM) 4: MD. JIBAHIL S/O LATE PYAR HUSSAIN RESIDENT OF RUPOHI TOWN MOUZA KHATOWAL DIST NAGAON (ASSAM) VERSUS ON THE DEATH OF RAFIQULLAH DEWAN ORS HIS LEGAL HEIRS 1.1:DILWAR HUSSAIN DEWAN RESIDENT OF RUPOHI TOWN MOUZA KHATOWAL DIST NAGAON (ASSAM) 1.2:MUKTAR HUSSAIN DEWAN RESIDENT OF RUPOHI TOWN MOUZA KHATOWAL DIST NAGAON (ASSAM) Page No.# 2/3 1.3:MANZILA KHATUN RESIDENT OF RUPOHI TOWN MOUZA KHATOWAL DIST NAGAON (ASSAM) 1.4:ABEDA KHATUN ALL ARE RESIDENT OF RUPOHI TOWN MOUZA KHATOWAL DIST NAGAON (ASSAM) 782125 2:ON THE DEATH OF MD. MUSSTT. KULSUM BIBI HER LEGAL HEIRS 2.1:MD. JAFAR HUSSAIN S/O LATE MD. MUSSTT. KULSUM BIBI RESIDENT OF NORTH DIMRUPAR PO KOPAH BARI PS MURAJAR NILBAGAN DIST HOJAI ASSAM 782445 2.2:MD. TAPAZUL HUSSAIN S/O LATE MD. MUSSTT. KULSUM BIBI RESIDENT OF NORTH DIMRUPAR PO KOPAH BARI PS MURAJAR NILBAGAN DIST HOJAI ASSAM 782445 2.3:MUSST. FIROZA KHATUN D/O LATE MD. MUSSTT. KULSUM BIBI RESIDENT OF NORTH DIMRUPAR PO KOPAH BARI PS MURAJAR NILBAGAN DIST HOJAI ASSAM 782445 2.4:MUSST. AFIA KHATUN D/O LATE MD. MUSSTT. KULSUM BIBI RESIDENT OF NORTH DIMRUPAR PO KOPAH BARI PS MURAJAR NILBAGAN Page No.# 3/3 DIST HOJAI ASSAM 782445 ------------ Advocate for : MR. D MOZUMDER Advocate for : MR. A R BHUYAN appearing for ON THE DEATH OF RAFIQULLAH DEWAN ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER 09.01.2026 Heard Ms. K. Bharali, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. N.Z. Choudhury, learned counsel for the opposite party. 2. This interlocutory application, under Order XXII Rule 9 of the CPC, is preferred by the applicants for setting aside the abatement in substituting the legal heirs due to death of the respondent Nos. 1 & 2 in RSA No. 298/2018. 3. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the interlocutory application for condoning the delay in filing the substitution application has already been allowed by this Court and as such, the abatement may be set aside. 4. The learned counsel for the opposite party submits that he has no objection in the event of allowing this application. 5. Accordingly, taking note of the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties, this Court is inclined to allow this application. 6. Accordingly, the abatement of the RSA No. 298/2018 on account of death of the respondent Nos. 1 & 2 stands set aside. 7. In terms of above, this I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant