Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17132 (JHR)

SUJIT KUMAR TIWARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/205/2022 · 2026-06-08

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:16362 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 205 of 2022 --------- Sujit Kumar Tiwary, aged about 35 years, S/o- Birendra Tiwari, R/o- Rajkharsawa, Grid sub-station, P.O.-Baramadu, Dist- Saraikela. ....Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Avinash Kumar, Father's name not known to the petitioner, the Chairman- Cum- Managing Director, Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited through its office at Engineers Building H.E.C Township, P.O & P.S Dhurwa, Dist - Ranchi. 3. Sri K.K Verma, Father's name not known to the petitioner, the Managing Director, Jharkhand Urja Sancharan Nigam Limited through its office at Engineers Building H.E.C Township, P.O & P.S - Dhurwa, Dist - Ranchi. 4. Sri Sunil Dutt Xaxa, father's name not known to the petitioner, GM Personnel cum General Administration, Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited through its office at Engineers Building H.E.C Township, P.O & P.S - Dhurwa, Dist Ranchi. 5. Sri Ashok Kumar, father's name not known to the petitioner, Deputy General Manager (HR) Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited through its office at Engineers Building H.E.C Township, P.O & P.S Dhurwa, Dist Ranchi. 6. Sri Rajesh Kumar Pandy, father's name not known to the petitioner, Deputy General Manager (P), Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited through its office at Engineers Building H.E.C Township, P.O & P.S Dhurwa, Dist Ranchi. ....Opp. Parties --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner(s) : None For the O.P.-State : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Roy, A.C. to G.A.-III For the O.P.-JUVNL : Mr. Ashok Kr. Yadav, Sr.S.C. --------- 10/Dated:- 08.06.2026 1. None appears for the petitioner. 2. Having regard to the fact that the order passed by the Writ Court has been set aside by the Division Bench of this Court; accordingly, no contempt is made out. 3. Consequently, the instant contempt application stands dismissed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) JUNE 08, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 19/06/2026