APHC010076792018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 3400/2018 Between: 1. MRS. DUVURI VENKATA KRISHNAMMA, W/O DUVURI SRINIVASULU REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O H. NO. 2-41, CHINTAVANARN VILLAGE, CHILLAKURU MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to arrange to pay the compensation in accordance with the market value / rules in force for the lands surrendered by the petitioner and accepted by the respondents under Section 10 (1) of A.P. Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agriculture Holdings) Act, 1973 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay immediately a sum equivalent to half of the estimated compensation payable to the petitioner as part payment of the compensation payable to the petitioner and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V PREETI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 The Court made the following ORDER: When the matter was adjourned on 21.01.2026, learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through online and requested time to get instructions from his client. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 04.02.2026. On 04.02.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner, hence, the matter was listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Today when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 11.02.2026 KAS 4 198 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 3400/2018 Dated: 11.02.2026 KAS