Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010080622022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2845/2022 RASEDA BEWA W/O LT. HAFIZUR RAHMAN, R/O VILL-PATAKATA, P.O.-PATAKATA, P.S.- SOUTH SALMARA, DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 783127 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06 2:THE ASSAM STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY GHY-01 3:THE DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY DHUBRI REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY P.O.-DHUBRI P.S.-DHUBRI DIST-DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-783301 4:THE CHAIRMAN DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY DHUBRI ASSAM P.O.-DHUBRI P.S.-DHUBRI DIST-DHUBRI ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 PIN-783301 5:THE DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY P.O.-HATSINGIMARI P.S.-SOUTH SALMARA DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR ASSAM PIN-783135 6:THE CHAIRMAN DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR ASSAM P.O.-HATSINGIMARI P.S.-SOUTH SALMARA DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR ASSAM PIN-78313 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. N NASRIN, MR K ISLAM,MD. I H KHAN Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, GAUHATI HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICE COMMITTEE,SC, ASSAM STATE LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORTY BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 07.01.2026 None appears for the petitioner on call. Ms. RS Chowdhury, learned Standing Counsel, Assam State Legal Services Authority (ASALSA) submits that the petitioner has been granted compensation of an amount of Rs.3,75,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Seventy Five Thousand only) and the same has been received. In addition thereto an amount of Rs.1, Page No.# 3/3 25,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Twenty Five Thousand only) has also been paid to one Siroja Begum, who is stated to be the second wife of the deceased. Both the wives therefore have been paid necessary compensation by the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority (DLSA), South Salmara, Mankachar. Copies of the receipts and their signatures are enclosed as Annexure-D to the affidavit-in- opposition filed by the ASALSA. Under such circumstances, no further cause appears to be alive in the present writ petition. Mr. N Goswami, learned Government Advocate, Assam appears for the respondents no. 1, 3 to 6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant