[2026:JHHC:17804] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3590 of 2026 Rajesh Bhuiyan @ Rajesh Bharti (aged about 35 yrs) son of Rajendra Bharti, resident of village Kamal, P.O Kunda, P.S Kunda, District … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Ram Lakhan Yadav , Adv. For the State : Mr. Tarun Kumar , Addl.. PP 04 / 18.06.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Balumath P.S case no 240/2020, S.T.No. 114/2021 instituted under Section 25(1-A), 26(2), 35 of Arms Act and section 17 C.L.A Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was a member of TSPC Naxalite organization and from the co- accused one SLR has been recovered. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 3 of the supplementary affidavit of the bail application and chargesheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 09.01.2026 , as mentioned in para 9 of this bail application. It is next submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case, hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge -III, Latehar in connection with Balumath P.S case no 240/2020, S.T.No. 114/2021 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co- operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 18.06.2026 Smita/-