Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17125 (AP)

RAMINENI SEETHARAMAIAH v. S SATYANARAYANA GARU IAS

CC/613/2026 · 2026-03-12

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010077312026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 613/2026 Between: 1. RAMINENI SEETHARAMAIAH, S/O. UMAMAHESWARARAO, AGED 52 YEARS R/O. 2-9, BRAHMANAKODUR VILLAGE, PONNUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. S SATYANARAYANA GARU IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, BC WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PINCODE 522237. 2. PEEYUSH KUMAR GARU IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PINCODE 522237. 3. G BHIMA SANKAR RAO GARU, DIRECTOR (FAC), ECONOMICALLY BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT, 2ND FLOOR, SRI VISHNU TOWERS, KRISHNAVENI SCHOOL ROAD, PORANKI, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNADISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, SRK, J CC No.613 of 2026 2 for their willful disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 20.11.2025 in W.P. No. 26989 of 2025 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIVA NAGARJUNA SIDHADAPU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. U KANAKA RAJU The Court made the following ORDER: This Contempt Case has been filed seeking to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 20.11.2025 passed by this Court in WP No.26989 of 2025. 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, since the respondents have complied with the order of this Court, no further orders are necessary to be passed in this Contempt Case. 3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Contempt Case shall stand closed. ________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:13.03.2026 sj SRK, J CC No.613 of 2026 3 186 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Contempt Case No.613 of 2026 Date:13.03.2026 sj