RAUSHAN KUMAR ALIAS RAUSHAN SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3476/2026 · 2026-06-17
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17121 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17121 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:17598 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 3476 of 2026
------ Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Singh, aged about 27 years, s/o late Ramu Singh @ Devchand Singh, r/o Village-Kajri Khurd, P.O. & P.S.-Jandaha, Dist.-Vaishali (Bihar)
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.03 Dated- 17.06.2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Balumath P.S. Case No.80 of 2025 (G.R. No. 17 of 2026) registered for the offences punishable under sections 111(3)/ 111(4)/ 308(4)/ 308(5)/ 324(5)/326(f)/61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 27 of Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused persons fired upon the Hywa vehicle from fire arm. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is then submitted that without putting him on T.I. Parade against the petitioner, charge sheet has been submitted in this case. It is further submitted that till now no witness has been examined though charge has been framed. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 03.11.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person with similar allegation has already been admitted to bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court
vide order dated 01.04.2026 in B.A. No.1617 of 2026. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Latehar, in connection with Balumath P.S. Case No.80 of 2025 (G.R. No. 17 of 2026) with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
17.06.2026 Gunjan-