Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1712 (AP)

MURIKIPUDI JOJI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/8979/2026 · 2026-04-06

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010160522026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 8979/2026 Between: MURIKIPUDI JOJI, S/O. ELISHA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O. SC COLONY, ATTALURU VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT-522601. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR, ANDHRAPRADESH- 522237 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, OFFICE OF DGP, VIJAYAWADA GUNTUR HIGHWAY, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522503. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARSARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT-522601. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, AMARAVATHI POLICE STATION, AMARAVATHI, PALNADU DISTRICT-522663. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: KHAJA KHUTUBUDDIN SHAIK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.8979 of 2026 Dated 07.04.2026 GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…to issue appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly the 4th Respondent in not registering the F I R against the accused despite the MedicoLegal CaseMLC registered vide O P No 1080 dated 14 02 2026 as illegal arbitrary unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents particularly 4th respondent to register the F I R against concerned persons and be pleased to pass….” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Mr. Khaja Khutubuddin Shaik, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the complaint of the petitioner was not registered as an FIR, despite it being a Medico-Legal Case (MLC). 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that the police have registered a case in Cr.No.44 of 2026 of Amaravathi Police Station, Palnadu District, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 118(1) and 79 of ‘the BNSS’, and the investigation is going on. 5. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, and recording the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the 3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.8979 of 2026 Dated 07.04.2026 Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondent No.4 to bring the investigation to a logical conclusion in accordance with law. 6. With the above observations and directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 07.04.2026 RSI 4 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.8979 of 2026 Dated 07.04.2026 169 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 8979 of 2026 Date:07.04.2026 RSI