Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17114 (AP)

AUDIO TEKK SRI SAI RAM ELECTRONICS v. ANIL KUMAR SINGHAL,I.A.S

CC/1067/2023 · 2026-03-10

D Ramesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010078802023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1067/2023 Between: 1. AUDIO TEKK SRI SAI RAM ELECTRONICS, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETRIX TADI SARADAKUMARI,W/O SRINIVAS KUMAR, DOOR NO.78-2-5/2, FIRST FLOOR, SOMALAMMA TEMPLE STREET, NEAR RTC COMPLEX, GANDHI NAGAR RAJ AMAHENDRAVARAM - 533101 EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. ANIL KUMAR SINGHAL I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI NATARAJAN GULZAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VCLAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. PS GIRISHA I A S, ,DISTRICT COLLECTOR ANNAMAYA DISTRICT. 4. MEDIDA JAHNAVI SUB COLLECTOR, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 5. M A MURALI, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. RR 1 AND 2 DISCHARGED AS PER COURT ORDER DT.23/03/2023. 6. SRI CHAMAKURI SRIDHAR I A S, DISTRICT COLLECTOR MADANAPALLE ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT 7. SRI MEGA SWARUP I A S, SUB DISTRICT COLLECTOR MADANAPALLE ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT RR6 AND 7 ARE SUO MOTU IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 17 06 2025 IN C C NO 1067 OF 2023 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to summon and punish the respondents herein under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of the Court Act for willfully disobeying and non-implementing the orders passed by the Honourable Court in Writ Petition No. 31436 of 2022 dated 30.9.2022 and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Y SUDHAKAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. ASHOK RAM V 2. T BALASWAMI 3. SUSHMA YAGANTI 4. P RAJANI REDDY 5. T N M RANGA RAO The Court made the following ORDER: 1. This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 30.09.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.31436 of 2022. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 30.09.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.31436 of 2022, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. 3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date :11.03.2026 RSD 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH C.C. No.1067 of 2023 Date :11.03.2026 RSD