- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13554 WP No. 33595 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.33595 OF 2018 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. CHIKKA NANJAMMA W/O LATE D. HANUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT #197, AJJAPPA COMPOUND, 4TH CROSS, VINAYAKA LAYOUT, NAYANDAHALLI, MYSORE ROAD, BANGALORE DISTRICT-572 139. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H S SANTHOSH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MUNIKRISHNA D M S/O MUTTHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT #77, BEHIND GANESHA TEMPLE, NAYANDAHALLI VILLAGE, NAYANDAHALLI POST, MYSORE ROAD, BANGALORE DISTRICT-572 139. 2. BHRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, N.R. SQUARE, BANGALORE-560 002. Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13554 WP No. 33595 of 2018 3. THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BHRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE CHANDRA LAYOUT SUB-DIVISION 4TH MAIL ROAD, M.C. LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560 040. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE BMTF, BHRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE CENTRAL OFFICE, N.R. SQUARE, BANGALORE-560 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. N.R. NAIK, ADVOCATE FOR R.1 (ABSENT); SRI. PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R.2 TO R.4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 14.06.2017 VIDE ANNEXURE-E GIVEN ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER AND TAKE ACTION AGAINST THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW; ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13554 WP No. 33595 of 2018 ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the subject matter of the writ petition is also the subject matter in Revenue Appeal No.1035/2019 pending on the file of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore. He further submits that the petitioner has successfully included herself in the said appeal and that she intends to pursue her remedies therein. 2. Learned counsel for respondent no.1 is absent. 3. Learned counsel for respondent nos.2 to 4 does not dispute the averment made by the petitioner. 4. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petition is disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedies before the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal in Revenue Appeal No.1035/2019, in accordance with law. 5. Karnataka Appellate Tribunal is directed to dispose of the aforementioned appeal as expeditiously as possible. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13554 WP No. 33595 of 2018 6. In view of disposal of the main petition, pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. SD/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE VMB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 54