Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17108 (PAT)

Rajesh Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./23663/2026 · 2026-05-12

Praveen Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23663 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-171 Year-2025 Thana- LAUKAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Rajesh Yadav S/o Krishna Dev Yadav @ Kishun Deo Yadav R/o Village - Koriyahi, P.S - Laukhi, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pravashankar Mishra, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Amitesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 12-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Laukhi P.S. Case No. 171 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. 3. As per the allegation petitioner is alleged to have assaulted by means of sharp-cutting farsa on the head of the informant, followed by an assault by co-accused Anil Kumar Yadav, by sharp cutting farsa on his head. 4. Learned counsel has submitted that there is a case and counter-case between the parties. It has been submitted that, due to a sudden quarrel, a free fight took place between the parties, and injuries were sustained on both sides. It has further Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23663 of 2026(3) dt.12-05-2026 2/2 been submitted that there is no allegation regarding repetition of the blow. It has also been submitted that good sense has prevailed between the parties, and they have entered into a compromise without any threat, coercion, or promise. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 24.01.2026 5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the parties and taking into account the facts and circumstance of the case, let the petitioner above-named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, in connection with Laukhi P.S. Case No. 171 of 2025. 7. The application stands allowed. niku/- (Praveen Kumar, J) U T