Mavuri Satya Veera Santosh Mohan Balaji v. THE STATE OF AP
WP/3417/2019 · 2026-03-09
Sumathi Jagadam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17108 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17108 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010076462019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 3417/2019 Between:
1. MAVURI SATYA VEERA SANTOSH MOHAN BALAJI, S/O VENAKTA RAMANA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/O D.NO.53-33-16, K.R.M COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, ARNARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, ANANDAPURAM,
4. PATHIVADA APPALA NARASAMMA, W/O LATE KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O VEMULAVALASA VILLAGE, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. PATHIVADA GOPI, S/O LATE KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O VEMULAVALASA VILLAGE, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. PATHIVADA GANESH, S/O LATE KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O VEMULAVALASA VILLAGE, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 7. PATHIVADA NAGA, S/O LATE KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O VEMULAVALASA VILLAGE,
ANANDAPURAM MANDAL,
2 JS, J W.P.No.3417/2019
VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toTo issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Prohibition restraining the 2nd respondent from entertaining and deciding the Revision vide R.P.No.71 of 2018 instituted by the respondents No.4 to 8 herein under the provisions of A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971, in so far as the property situated in Sy.No.95/2 with an extent of Ac.0.64 cents of Vemulavalasa Village, Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District is illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To stay of all further proceedings in R.P.No.71 of 2018 on the file of the 2nd respondent pending disposal of writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To vacate the order dated 14.03.2019 passed in W.P No. 3417 of 2019 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V V N NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2.
S PRANATHI
3 JS, J W.P.No.3417/2019
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri.D.Prasad Kumar, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 10.03.2026 rsd
4 JS, J W.P.No.3417/2019
1 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 3417/2019
Date: 10.03.2026 rsd